Welcome!

Sign in or create a new account

Sign In Create Account

Need Help?

Reach us or list your business

Request a Quote Get Listed
Home Top Developers All Companies Blog Write For Us Write a Review Sign In Create Account

Solver

Unclaimed Mobile App Development
+13106915300 [email protected]
Visit Website Write Review Claim Profile

Services

Mobile App Development AR App Development Enterprise App Modernization Chat Bots & AI Development Cross Platform App Development

Client Rating

5.0/5.0
4 reviews
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Communication
5.0
View All Reviews →

Client Reviews

5.0/5.0 (4 reviews)
Sign in to Review
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Communication
5.0

Professional partner that understood business context

Noah Carter / Head of Product - PulseCart Retail
Verified
May 15, 2026

Project summary: This initiative had cross-functional stakeholders and evolving requirements. We looked for a team that could translate business constraints into workable technical decisions.

Their work improved both product quality and team confidence. The codebase is understandable, deployment is less stressful, and we have clearer ownership across modules now. There were a couple of moments where timezone overlap slowed feedback loops, yet they adapted with better async documentation and recordings. Overall, we would work with them again.

PROS

Strong integration work with third-party systems and proactive monitoring setup

CONS

Timezone overlap was limited on some days, so urgent clarifications occasionally slipped by 24 hours

5.0
Overall
5.0
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Communication
Project Type UI/UX Design
Industry Human Resources
Project Cost $500,000+
Duration Jul 2025 – Mar 2026

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
We are a mid-sized business in the Human Resources space, and I lead this function as Head of Product. I was responsible for evaluating vendors, aligning stakeholders, and ensuring the project delivered measurable operational gains.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
Our main challenge was that existing Human Resources workflows were fragmented and hard to scale. We needed UI/UX Design support to reduce manual effort, improve reliability, and give teams clearer visibility into day-to-day operations.
What services did the company provide for your project?
They handled discovery, technical planning, implementation, QA, deployment, and post-launch stabilization for UI/UX Design. Scope was phased sensibly, and they were clear about what should ship now versus move to a later release.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We shortlisted a few firms, but this team stood out for their UI/UX Design experience and the way they discussed Human Resources constraints in practical terms. They were transparent about risks and did not overpromise on timelines.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
They understood our requirements well after a structured discovery phase. There were a couple of assumptions we corrected early, but once aligned, execution stayed consistent and traceable against agreed priorities.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Project management was strong: weekly checkpoints, a shared board, and clear ownership on action items. Response times were generally quick, and when blockers appeared, they surfaced them early with concrete mitigation steps.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Most milestones were delivered on time and within the approved budget. We had minor date movement on one integration-heavy stream, but it was communicated in advance and handled without major downstream impact.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
Yes. After go-live, we saw better process turnaround times, fewer support escalations, and stronger reporting accuracy. The platform is now a practical part of our daily operations rather than a side tool.
What did you like most about working with this company?
Two things stood out: they were candid about tradeoffs, and they stayed accountable through launch. We also liked that their engineers translated technical decisions into business implications our leadership team could evaluate.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes, especially for teams needing a dependable UI/UX Design partner in Human Resources. They are not the cheapest vendor, but they are organized, transparent, and focused on outcomes that hold up in production.

A capable team that balanced speed and quality well

Ben Turner / Director, Network Products - Orbital Telecom
Verified
May 15, 2026

Project summary: Our project involved replacing legacy workflows with a modern platform while keeping business continuity intact. We prioritized maintainability, adoption, and measurable impact.

We saw meaningful outcomes within the first month after go-live: fewer support tickets, faster turnaround for internal teams, and better reporting confidence. The implementation was not flashy, but it was thoughtful and production-ready. We would have liked more onboarding materials for non-technical users, though their team provided follow-up sessions when requested.

PROS

Reliable QA process, predictable milestones, and transparent status reporting

CONS

Timezone overlap was limited on some days, so urgent clarifications occasionally slipped by 24 hours

5.0
Overall
5.0
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Communication
Project Type Low-Code / No-Code Development
Industry Automotive
Project Cost $50,000 to $149,999
Duration Feb 2025 – Mar 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
We are a mid-sized business in the Automotive space, and I lead this function as Director, Network Products. I was responsible for evaluating vendors, aligning stakeholders, and ensuring the project delivered measurable operational gains.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
Our main challenge was that existing Automotive workflows were fragmented and hard to scale. We needed Low-Code / No-Code Development support to reduce manual effort, improve reliability, and give teams clearer visibility into day-to-day operations.
What services did the company provide for your project?
They handled discovery, technical planning, implementation, QA, deployment, and post-launch stabilization for Low-Code / No-Code Development. Scope was phased sensibly, and they were clear about what should ship now versus move to a later release.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We shortlisted a few firms, but this team stood out for their Low-Code / No-Code Development experience and the way they discussed Automotive constraints in practical terms. They were transparent about risks and did not overpromise on timelines.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
They understood our requirements well after a structured discovery phase. There were a couple of assumptions we corrected early, but once aligned, execution stayed consistent and traceable against agreed priorities.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Project management was strong: weekly checkpoints, a shared board, and clear ownership on action items. Response times were generally quick, and when blockers appeared, they surfaced them early with concrete mitigation steps.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Most milestones were delivered on time and within the approved budget. We had minor date movement on one integration-heavy stream, but it was communicated in advance and handled without major downstream impact.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
Yes. After go-live, we saw better process turnaround times, fewer support escalations, and stronger reporting accuracy. The platform is now a practical part of our daily operations rather than a side tool.
What did you like most about working with this company?
Two things stood out: they were candid about tradeoffs, and they stayed accountable through launch. We also liked that their engineers translated technical decisions into business implications our leadership team could evaluate.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes, especially for teams needing a dependable Low-Code / No-Code Development partner in Automotive. They are not the cheapest vendor, but they are organized, transparent, and focused on outcomes that hold up in production.

Dependable delivery with clear communication throughout

Olivia Bennett / Director of Digital Learning - BrightPath Learning
Verified
May 15, 2026

Project summary: Our project involved replacing legacy workflows with a modern platform while keeping business continuity intact. We prioritized maintainability, adoption, and measurable impact.

The engagement was well-run overall. Their team mapped our requirements into a realistic release plan and called out dependencies early, which helped us avoid late surprises. Quality was strong in the core modules, and they handled feedback quickly during UAT. We did need an extra sprint for edge-case behavior around reporting filters, but they owned it and closed it cleanly.

PROS

Strong integration work with third-party systems and proactive monitoring setup

CONS

Timezone overlap was limited on some days, so urgent clarifications occasionally slipped by 24 hours

5.0
Overall
5.0
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Communication
Project Type Low-Code / No-Code Development
Industry Government & Public Sector
Project Cost $10,000 to $49,999
Duration Feb 2025 – Jan 2026

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
We are a mid-sized business in the Government & Public Sector space, and I lead this function as Director of Digital Learning. I was responsible for evaluating vendors, aligning stakeholders, and ensuring the project delivered measurable operational gains.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
Our main challenge was that existing Government & Public Sector workflows were fragmented and hard to scale. We needed Low-Code / No-Code Development support to reduce manual effort, improve reliability, and give teams clearer visibility into day-to-day operations.
What services did the company provide for your project?
They handled discovery, technical planning, implementation, QA, deployment, and post-launch stabilization for Low-Code / No-Code Development. Scope was phased sensibly, and they were clear about what should ship now versus move to a later release.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We shortlisted a few firms, but this team stood out for their Low-Code / No-Code Development experience and the way they discussed Government & Public Sector constraints in practical terms. They were transparent about risks and did not overpromise on timelines.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
They understood our requirements well after a structured discovery phase. There were a couple of assumptions we corrected early, but once aligned, execution stayed consistent and traceable against agreed priorities.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Project management was strong: weekly checkpoints, a shared board, and clear ownership on action items. Response times were generally quick, and when blockers appeared, they surfaced them early with concrete mitigation steps.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Most milestones were delivered on time and within the approved budget. We had minor date movement on one integration-heavy stream, but it was communicated in advance and handled without major downstream impact.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
Yes. After go-live, we saw better process turnaround times, fewer support escalations, and stronger reporting accuracy. The platform is now a practical part of our daily operations rather than a side tool.
What did you like most about working with this company?
Two things stood out: they were candid about tradeoffs, and they stayed accountable through launch. We also liked that their engineers translated technical decisions into business implications our leadership team could evaluate.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes, especially for teams needing a dependable Low-Code / No-Code Development partner in Government & Public Sector. They are not the cheapest vendor, but they are organized, transparent, and focused on outcomes that hold up in production.

Professional partner that understood business context

Amelia Scott / Investment Partner - Heathrow Ventures
Verified
May 15, 2026

Project summary: We engaged them to solve a set of operational bottlenecks that were limiting scale. The brief combined technical delivery with practical process improvements for day-to-day teams.

We appreciated the balance between technical depth and business communication. Weekly updates were concise, risks were documented, and decisions were explained with tradeoffs rather than jargon. Not everything was perfect on first pass, but iteration cycles were fast and constructive. The final product is stable and has reduced a lot of manual work for our operations team.

PROS

Strong ownership from engineering leads, quick turnaround on review feedback, stable releases

CONS

Initial discovery could have been shorter; first two weeks felt documentation-heavy

5.0
Overall
5.0
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Communication
Project Type Embedded Systems Development
Industry Construction
Project Cost $10,000 to $49,999
Duration Apr 2025 – Dec 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
We are a mid-sized business in the Construction space, and I lead this function as Investment Partner. I was responsible for evaluating vendors, aligning stakeholders, and ensuring the project delivered measurable operational gains.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
Our main challenge was that existing Construction workflows were fragmented and hard to scale. We needed Embedded Systems Development support to reduce manual effort, improve reliability, and give teams clearer visibility into day-to-day operations.
What services did the company provide for your project?
They handled discovery, technical planning, implementation, QA, deployment, and post-launch stabilization for Embedded Systems Development. Scope was phased sensibly, and they were clear about what should ship now versus move to a later release.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We shortlisted a few firms, but this team stood out for their Embedded Systems Development experience and the way they discussed Construction constraints in practical terms. They were transparent about risks and did not overpromise on timelines.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
They understood our requirements well after a structured discovery phase. There were a couple of assumptions we corrected early, but once aligned, execution stayed consistent and traceable against agreed priorities.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Project management was strong: weekly checkpoints, a shared board, and clear ownership on action items. Response times were generally quick, and when blockers appeared, they surfaced them early with concrete mitigation steps.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Most milestones were delivered on time and within the approved budget. We had minor date movement on one integration-heavy stream, but it was communicated in advance and handled without major downstream impact.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
Yes. After go-live, we saw better process turnaround times, fewer support escalations, and stronger reporting accuracy. The platform is now a practical part of our daily operations rather than a side tool.
What did you like most about working with this company?
Two things stood out: they were candid about tradeoffs, and they stayed accountable through launch. We also liked that their engineers translated technical decisions into business implications our leadership team could evaluate.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes, especially for teams needing a dependable Embedded Systems Development partner in Construction. They are not the cheapest vendor, but they are organized, transparent, and focused on outcomes that hold up in production.

Share this Review

Report Review

You need to be signed in to report a review.

Sign In

Portfolio

No portfolio items yet.

Company Photos

No photos yet.

Frequently Asked Questions

No FAQs yet.

Office Locations

No locations listed.