Welcome!

Sign in or create a new account

Sign In Create Account

Need Help?

Reach us or list your business

Request a Quote Get Listed
Home Top Developers All Companies Blog Write For Us Write a Review Sign In Create Account

Soft Galaxy

Unclaimed Mobile App Development
+12066699802 [email protected]
Visit Website Write Review Claim Profile

About

Soft Galaxy is a leading mobile app development company. They bring ideas to life by giving industry standard solutions to businesses, from start-up companies to multinational companies. They are a leading web and mobile app development company. Soft Galaxy can help you combine complex back-end technologies to make seamless cross-channel client experiences.

Last updated May 13, 2026

Services

Mobile App Development Web Development VR App Development UI-UX Design Blockchain Development Cryptocurrency Wallet Development Ethereum Blockchain ICO consulting Blockchain Implementation

Client Rating

5.0/5.0
2 reviews
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Communication
5.0
View All Reviews →

Client Reviews

5.0/5.0 (2 reviews)
Sign in to Review
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Communication
5.0

A capable team that balanced speed and quality well

Isabella Rossi / Head of Digital Commerce - Arco Fashion House
Verified
May 15, 2026

Project summary: Our lending product had grown quickly, and manual risk checks were slowing decisions. We asked for a solution that balanced faster approvals with transparent, regulator-friendly logic.

From procurement to handoff, this felt like a professional partnership. They met commitments, documented key decisions, and aligned well with our internal QA process. The architecture is cleaner than what we had before, and maintenance is easier. Some backlog items are still pending by choice, but the delivered scope is complete and dependable.

PROS

Good domain understanding, thoughtful architecture choices, and clean handoff documentation

CONS

A few UI polish items spilled into post-launch, though core functionality was stable

5.0
Overall
5.0
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Communication
Project Type Low-Code / No-Code Development
Industry Financial Services
Project Cost $150,000 to $499,999
Duration Jun 2025 – Sep 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
We are a mid-sized business in the Financial Services space, and I lead this function as Head of Digital Commerce. I was responsible for evaluating vendors, aligning stakeholders, and ensuring the project delivered measurable operational gains.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
Our main challenge was that existing Financial Services workflows were fragmented and hard to scale. We needed Low-Code / No-Code Development support to reduce manual effort, improve reliability, and give teams clearer visibility into day-to-day operations.
What services did the company provide for your project?
They handled discovery, technical planning, implementation, QA, deployment, and post-launch stabilization for Low-Code / No-Code Development. Scope was phased sensibly, and they were clear about what should ship now versus move to a later release.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We shortlisted a few firms, but this team stood out for their Low-Code / No-Code Development experience and the way they discussed Financial Services constraints in practical terms. They were transparent about risks and did not overpromise on timelines.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
They understood our requirements well after a structured discovery phase. There were a couple of assumptions we corrected early, but once aligned, execution stayed consistent and traceable against agreed priorities.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Project management was strong: weekly checkpoints, a shared board, and clear ownership on action items. Response times were generally quick, and when blockers appeared, they surfaced them early with concrete mitigation steps.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Most milestones were delivered on time and within the approved budget. We had minor date movement on one integration-heavy stream, but it was communicated in advance and handled without major downstream impact.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
Yes. After go-live, we saw better process turnaround times, fewer support escalations, and stronger reporting accuracy. The platform is now a practical part of our daily operations rather than a side tool.
What did you like most about working with this company?
Two things stood out: they were candid about tradeoffs, and they stayed accountable through launch. We also liked that their engineers translated technical decisions into business implications our leadership team could evaluate.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes, especially for teams needing a dependable Low-Code / No-Code Development partner in Financial Services. They are not the cheapest vendor, but they are organized, transparent, and focused on outcomes that hold up in production.

Web platform quality was high, with only minor post-launch tweaks

Noah Carter / Head of Product - PulseCart Retail
Verified
May 15, 2026

Project summary: Our project involved replacing legacy workflows with a modern platform while keeping business continuity intact. We prioritized maintainability, adoption, and measurable impact.

This team handled a complicated integration landscape better than our previous vendors. They were practical about what should be built now versus deferred, which kept timelines realistic. Testing coverage was decent and they were transparent when defects appeared. We still maintain a short backlog of non-critical enhancements, but the platform is already delivering value.

PROS

Responsive support after launch and willingness to refine workflows based on real user behavior

CONS

Initial discovery could have been shorter; first two weeks felt documentation-heavy

5.0
Overall
5.0
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Communication
Project Type Web Development
Industry Government & Public Sector
Project Cost $150,000 to $499,999
Duration Apr 2025 – Jan 2026

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
We are a mid-sized business in the Government & Public Sector space, and I lead this function as Head of Product. I was responsible for evaluating vendors, aligning stakeholders, and ensuring the project delivered measurable operational gains.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
Our main challenge was that existing Government & Public Sector workflows were fragmented and hard to scale. We needed Web Development support to reduce manual effort, improve reliability, and give teams clearer visibility into day-to-day operations.
What services did the company provide for your project?
They handled discovery, technical planning, implementation, QA, deployment, and post-launch stabilization for Web Development. Scope was phased sensibly, and they were clear about what should ship now versus move to a later release.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We shortlisted a few firms, but this team stood out for their Web Development experience and the way they discussed Government & Public Sector constraints in practical terms. They were transparent about risks and did not overpromise on timelines.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
They understood our requirements well after a structured discovery phase. There were a couple of assumptions we corrected early, but once aligned, execution stayed consistent and traceable against agreed priorities.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Project management was strong: weekly checkpoints, a shared board, and clear ownership on action items. Response times were generally quick, and when blockers appeared, they surfaced them early with concrete mitigation steps.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Most milestones were delivered on time and within the approved budget. We had minor date movement on one integration-heavy stream, but it was communicated in advance and handled without major downstream impact.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
Yes. After go-live, we saw better process turnaround times, fewer support escalations, and stronger reporting accuracy. The platform is now a practical part of our daily operations rather than a side tool.
What did you like most about working with this company?
Two things stood out: they were candid about tradeoffs, and they stayed accountable through launch. We also liked that their engineers translated technical decisions into business implications our leadership team could evaluate.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes, especially for teams needing a dependable Web Development partner in Government & Public Sector. They are not the cheapest vendor, but they are organized, transparent, and focused on outcomes that hold up in production.

Share this Review

Report Review

You need to be signed in to report a review.

Sign In

Portfolio

No portfolio items yet.

Company Photos

No photos yet.

Frequently Asked Questions

No FAQs yet.

Office Locations

No locations listed.