Established in 2010, little guy design has grown from project-based freelance work to a full-on digital marketing agency. They offer services at a fair price and will personally go through everything with you step by step – we will sit down and train you how to use your new products. They love what they do and their always happy to have a conversation about any aspect of the services they provide.
Last updated May 13, 2026
Project summary: We needed to improve booking confidence with clearer pricing and fewer failed payment flows. Integration stability with suppliers was a key success factor.
From procurement to handoff, this felt like a professional partnership. They met commitments, documented key decisions, and aligned well with our internal QA process. The architecture is cleaner than what we had before, and maintenance is easier. Some backlog items are still pending by choice, but the delivered scope is complete and dependable.
Ability to translate business goals into usable product decisions, not just technical output
One third-party integration took longer than expected due to external API constraints
Project summary: Our care platform had usability issues for both staff and patients. We commissioned a rebuild focused on faster workflows, clearer records, and fewer support escalations.
We appreciated the balance between technical depth and business communication. Weekly updates were concise, risks were documented, and decisions were explained with tradeoffs rather than jargon. Not everything was perfect on first pass, but iteration cycles were fast and constructive. The final product is stable and has reduced a lot of manual work for our operations team.
Strong ownership from engineering leads, quick turnaround on review feedback, stable releases
Their pricing was not the lowest option, but delivery quality largely justified the cost
Project summary: Our brand expanded into multiple regions, and our old stack could not keep up with campaigns and seasonal traffic. We needed stronger ecommerce operations with less manual intervention.
The engagement was well-run overall. Their team mapped our requirements into a realistic release plan and called out dependencies early, which helped us avoid late surprises. Quality was strong in the core modules, and they handled feedback quickly during UAT. We did need an extra sprint for edge-case behavior around reporting filters, but they owned it and closed it cleanly.
Clear sprint communication, dependable delivery, and practical technical recommendations
Their pricing was not the lowest option, but delivery quality largely justified the cost
Project summary: We engaged them to solve a set of operational bottlenecks that were limiting scale. The brief combined technical delivery with practical process improvements for day-to-day teams.
Communication quality was one of the stronger parts of this engagement. We always had visibility into progress, blockers, and next steps. Their engineers challenged assumptions respectfully and prevented a couple of costly feature detours. There were minor delays during final data migration, but they staffed up and recovered most of the schedule quickly.
Good domain understanding, thoughtful architecture choices, and clean handoff documentation
Some change requests required formal reprioritization, which was correct but slowed quick tweaks