Welcome!

Sign in or create a new account

Sign In Create Account

Need Help?

Reach us or list your business

Request a Quote Get Listed
Home Top Developers All Companies Blog Write For Us Write a Review Sign In Create Account

GTECH Information Technology

Unclaimed Mobile App Development
+97143285071 [email protected]
Visit Website Write Review Claim Profile

About

It is comprehensive technology solutions & integration services. Their objective is to become a technology substation. Their loyalty is to work on consistently delivering cost-effective and professionally implemented solutions. They believe that cost-effective digital and systems solutions should be the standard and accessible to all. Truly, one of the best mobile app development company.

Last updated May 13, 2026

Services

Mobile App Development Web Development Social Media Marketing SEO Game Development Content Management System

Client Rating

5.0/5.0
3 reviews
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Communication
5.0
View All Reviews →

Client Reviews

5.0/5.0 (3 reviews)
Sign in to Review
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Communication
5.0

Professional partner that understood business context

Isabella Rossi / Head of Digital Commerce - Arco Fashion House
Verified
May 15, 2026

Project summary: This initiative had cross-functional stakeholders and evolving requirements. We looked for a team that could translate business constraints into workable technical decisions.

This team handled a complicated integration landscape better than our previous vendors. They were practical about what should be built now versus deferred, which kept timelines realistic. Testing coverage was decent and they were transparent when defects appeared. We still maintain a short backlog of non-critical enhancements, but the platform is already delivering value.

PROS

Strong ownership from engineering leads, quick turnaround on review feedback, stable releases

CONS

One third-party integration took longer than expected due to external API constraints

5.0
Overall
5.0
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Communication
Project Type Industry-Specific Solutions
Industry Construction
Project Cost $50,000 to $149,999
Duration Mar 2025 – Nov 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
We are a mid-sized business in the Construction space, and I lead this function as Head of Digital Commerce. I was responsible for evaluating vendors, aligning stakeholders, and ensuring the project delivered measurable operational gains.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
Our main challenge was that existing Construction workflows were fragmented and hard to scale. We needed Industry-Specific Solutions support to reduce manual effort, improve reliability, and give teams clearer visibility into day-to-day operations.
What services did the company provide for your project?
They handled discovery, technical planning, implementation, QA, deployment, and post-launch stabilization for Industry-Specific Solutions. Scope was phased sensibly, and they were clear about what should ship now versus move to a later release.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We shortlisted a few firms, but this team stood out for their Industry-Specific Solutions experience and the way they discussed Construction constraints in practical terms. They were transparent about risks and did not overpromise on timelines.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
They understood our requirements well after a structured discovery phase. There were a couple of assumptions we corrected early, but once aligned, execution stayed consistent and traceable against agreed priorities.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Project management was strong: weekly checkpoints, a shared board, and clear ownership on action items. Response times were generally quick, and when blockers appeared, they surfaced them early with concrete mitigation steps.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Most milestones were delivered on time and within the approved budget. We had minor date movement on one integration-heavy stream, but it was communicated in advance and handled without major downstream impact.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
Yes. After go-live, we saw better process turnaround times, fewer support escalations, and stronger reporting accuracy. The platform is now a practical part of our daily operations rather than a side tool.
What did you like most about working with this company?
Two things stood out: they were candid about tradeoffs, and they stayed accountable through launch. We also liked that their engineers translated technical decisions into business implications our leadership team could evaluate.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes, especially for teams needing a dependable Industry-Specific Solutions partner in Construction. They are not the cheapest vendor, but they are organized, transparent, and focused on outcomes that hold up in production.

Practical AI implementation with measurable workflow impact

Arjun Mehta / VP Engineering - ShipLane Logistics
Verified
May 15, 2026

Project summary: We needed a partner who could handle ambiguity early, then execute predictably once requirements were clarified. Delivery discipline and communication quality were both important.

From procurement to handoff, this felt like a professional partnership. They met commitments, documented key decisions, and aligned well with our internal QA process. The architecture is cleaner than what we had before, and maintenance is easier. Some backlog items are still pending by choice, but the delivered scope is complete and dependable.

PROS

Strong ownership from engineering leads, quick turnaround on review feedback, stable releases

CONS

Would prefer more proactive release notes for minor hotfixes

5.0
Overall
5.0
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Communication
Project Type AI & Machine Learning
Industry Sports & Fitness
Project Cost $50,000 to $149,999
Duration Dec 2024 – Jul 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
We are a mid-sized business in the Sports & Fitness space, and I lead this function as VP Engineering. I was responsible for evaluating vendors, aligning stakeholders, and ensuring the project delivered measurable operational gains.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
Our main challenge was that existing Sports & Fitness workflows were fragmented and hard to scale. We needed AI & Machine Learning support to reduce manual effort, improve reliability, and give teams clearer visibility into day-to-day operations.
What services did the company provide for your project?
They handled discovery, technical planning, implementation, QA, deployment, and post-launch stabilization for AI & Machine Learning. Scope was phased sensibly, and they were clear about what should ship now versus move to a later release.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We shortlisted a few firms, but this team stood out for their AI & Machine Learning experience and the way they discussed Sports & Fitness constraints in practical terms. They were transparent about risks and did not overpromise on timelines.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
They understood our requirements well after a structured discovery phase. There were a couple of assumptions we corrected early, but once aligned, execution stayed consistent and traceable against agreed priorities.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Project management was strong: weekly checkpoints, a shared board, and clear ownership on action items. Response times were generally quick, and when blockers appeared, they surfaced them early with concrete mitigation steps.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Most milestones were delivered on time and within the approved budget. We had minor date movement on one integration-heavy stream, but it was communicated in advance and handled without major downstream impact.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
Yes. After go-live, we saw better process turnaround times, fewer support escalations, and stronger reporting accuracy. The platform is now a practical part of our daily operations rather than a side tool.
What did you like most about working with this company?
Two things stood out: they were candid about tradeoffs, and they stayed accountable through launch. We also liked that their engineers translated technical decisions into business implications our leadership team could evaluate.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes, especially for teams needing a dependable AI & Machine Learning partner in Sports & Fitness. They are not the cheapest vendor, but they are organized, transparent, and focused on outcomes that hold up in production.

Dependable delivery with clear communication throughout

Theo Papadopoulos / Creative Technology Lead - Mythos Media Labs
Verified
May 15, 2026

Project summary: Our project involved replacing legacy workflows with a modern platform while keeping business continuity intact. We prioritized maintainability, adoption, and measurable impact.

Communication quality was one of the stronger parts of this engagement. We always had visibility into progress, blockers, and next steps. Their engineers challenged assumptions respectfully and prevented a couple of costly feature detours. There were minor delays during final data migration, but they staffed up and recovered most of the schedule quickly.

PROS

Responsive support after launch and willingness to refine workflows based on real user behavior

CONS

Their pricing was not the lowest option, but delivery quality largely justified the cost

5.0
Overall
5.0
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Communication
Project Type Low-Code / No-Code Development
Industry Aerospace & Defense
Project Cost $10,000 to $49,999
Duration Apr 2025 – Apr 2026

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
We are a mid-sized business in the Aerospace & Defense space, and I lead this function as Creative Technology Lead. I was responsible for evaluating vendors, aligning stakeholders, and ensuring the project delivered measurable operational gains.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
Our main challenge was that existing Aerospace & Defense workflows were fragmented and hard to scale. We needed Low-Code / No-Code Development support to reduce manual effort, improve reliability, and give teams clearer visibility into day-to-day operations.
What services did the company provide for your project?
They handled discovery, technical planning, implementation, QA, deployment, and post-launch stabilization for Low-Code / No-Code Development. Scope was phased sensibly, and they were clear about what should ship now versus move to a later release.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We shortlisted a few firms, but this team stood out for their Low-Code / No-Code Development experience and the way they discussed Aerospace & Defense constraints in practical terms. They were transparent about risks and did not overpromise on timelines.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
They understood our requirements well after a structured discovery phase. There were a couple of assumptions we corrected early, but once aligned, execution stayed consistent and traceable against agreed priorities.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Project management was strong: weekly checkpoints, a shared board, and clear ownership on action items. Response times were generally quick, and when blockers appeared, they surfaced them early with concrete mitigation steps.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Most milestones were delivered on time and within the approved budget. We had minor date movement on one integration-heavy stream, but it was communicated in advance and handled without major downstream impact.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
Yes. After go-live, we saw better process turnaround times, fewer support escalations, and stronger reporting accuracy. The platform is now a practical part of our daily operations rather than a side tool.
What did you like most about working with this company?
Two things stood out: they were candid about tradeoffs, and they stayed accountable through launch. We also liked that their engineers translated technical decisions into business implications our leadership team could evaluate.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes, especially for teams needing a dependable Low-Code / No-Code Development partner in Aerospace & Defense. They are not the cheapest vendor, but they are organized, transparent, and focused on outcomes that hold up in production.

Share this Review

Report Review

You need to be signed in to report a review.

Sign In

Portfolio

No portfolio items yet.

Company Photos

No photos yet.

Frequently Asked Questions

No FAQs yet.

Office Locations

No locations listed.