Welcome!

Sign in or create a new account

Sign In Create Account

Need Help?

Reach us or list your business

Request a Quote Get Listed
Home Top Developers All Companies Blog Write For Us Write a Review Sign In Create Account

Fjord

Unclaimed Mobile App Development
+15124208800 N/A
Visit Website Write Review Claim Profile

About

Fjord is a famous app development company. They always listen closely to know views that differ from their own and share new ideas. They have very talented app developers who are enthusiastic to do more and more unique things. They think that excellent things can just be produced by a sustainable, strong & professional team. They ensure an expert way and a lot of fair emotions. For this faith, they have produced a set of commands to help them.

Last updated May 13, 2026

Services

Mobile App Development Web Development UI-UX Design Web Design

Client Rating

5.0/5.0
4 reviews
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Communication
5.0
View All Reviews →

Client Reviews

5.0/5.0 (4 reviews)
Sign in to Review
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Communication
5.0

Useful IoT dashboards and better operational visibility

Isabella Rossi / Head of Digital Commerce - Arco Fashion House
Verified
May 15, 2026

Project summary: We engaged them to solve a set of operational bottlenecks that were limiting scale. The brief combined technical delivery with practical process improvements for day-to-day teams.

The engagement was well-run overall. Their team mapped our requirements into a realistic release plan and called out dependencies early, which helped us avoid late surprises. Quality was strong in the core modules, and they handled feedback quickly during UAT. We did need an extra sprint for edge-case behavior around reporting filters, but they owned it and closed it cleanly.

PROS

Clear sprint communication, dependable delivery, and practical technical recommendations

CONS

One third-party integration took longer than expected due to external API constraints

5.0
Overall
5.0
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Communication
Project Type IoT Development
Industry Nonprofit & NGO
Project Cost $50,000 to $149,999
Duration May 2025 – Jun 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
We are a mid-sized business in the Nonprofit & NGO space, and I lead this function as Head of Digital Commerce. I was responsible for evaluating vendors, aligning stakeholders, and ensuring the project delivered measurable operational gains.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
Our main challenge was that existing Nonprofit & NGO workflows were fragmented and hard to scale. We needed IoT Development support to reduce manual effort, improve reliability, and give teams clearer visibility into day-to-day operations.
What services did the company provide for your project?
They handled discovery, technical planning, implementation, QA, deployment, and post-launch stabilization for IoT Development. Scope was phased sensibly, and they were clear about what should ship now versus move to a later release.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We shortlisted a few firms, but this team stood out for their IoT Development experience and the way they discussed Nonprofit & NGO constraints in practical terms. They were transparent about risks and did not overpromise on timelines.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
They understood our requirements well after a structured discovery phase. There were a couple of assumptions we corrected early, but once aligned, execution stayed consistent and traceable against agreed priorities.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Project management was strong: weekly checkpoints, a shared board, and clear ownership on action items. Response times were generally quick, and when blockers appeared, they surfaced them early with concrete mitigation steps.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Most milestones were delivered on time and within the approved budget. We had minor date movement on one integration-heavy stream, but it was communicated in advance and handled without major downstream impact.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
Yes. After go-live, we saw better process turnaround times, fewer support escalations, and stronger reporting accuracy. The platform is now a practical part of our daily operations rather than a side tool.
What did you like most about working with this company?
Two things stood out: they were candid about tradeoffs, and they stayed accountable through launch. We also liked that their engineers translated technical decisions into business implications our leadership team could evaluate.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes, especially for teams needing a dependable IoT Development partner in Nonprofit & NGO. They are not the cheapest vendor, but they are organized, transparent, and focused on outcomes that hold up in production.

Professional partner that understood business context

Yusuf Rahman / Head of Transformation - CroftBank MEA
Verified
May 15, 2026

Project summary: Our operations team wanted a better way to manage inventory, cancellations, and customer communication from one place. The project focused on reliability during high-demand windows.

We saw meaningful outcomes within the first month after go-live: fewer support tickets, faster turnaround for internal teams, and better reporting confidence. The implementation was not flashy, but it was thoughtful and production-ready. We would have liked more onboarding materials for non-technical users, though their team provided follow-up sessions when requested.

PROS

Responsive support after launch and willingness to refine workflows based on real user behavior

CONS

Knowledge transfer for non-technical users needed one extra session beyond the original plan

5.0
Overall
5.0
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Communication
Project Type Quality Assurance & Testing
Industry Travel & Hospitality
Project Cost $150,000 to $499,999
Duration Jul 2025 – Aug 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
We are a mid-sized business in the Travel & Hospitality space, and I lead this function as Head of Transformation. I was responsible for evaluating vendors, aligning stakeholders, and ensuring the project delivered measurable operational gains.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
Our main challenge was that existing Travel & Hospitality workflows were fragmented and hard to scale. We needed Quality Assurance & Testing support to reduce manual effort, improve reliability, and give teams clearer visibility into day-to-day operations.
What services did the company provide for your project?
They handled discovery, technical planning, implementation, QA, deployment, and post-launch stabilization for Quality Assurance & Testing. Scope was phased sensibly, and they were clear about what should ship now versus move to a later release.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We shortlisted a few firms, but this team stood out for their Quality Assurance & Testing experience and the way they discussed Travel & Hospitality constraints in practical terms. They were transparent about risks and did not overpromise on timelines.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
They understood our requirements well after a structured discovery phase. There were a couple of assumptions we corrected early, but once aligned, execution stayed consistent and traceable against agreed priorities.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Project management was strong: weekly checkpoints, a shared board, and clear ownership on action items. Response times were generally quick, and when blockers appeared, they surfaced them early with concrete mitigation steps.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Most milestones were delivered on time and within the approved budget. We had minor date movement on one integration-heavy stream, but it was communicated in advance and handled without major downstream impact.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
Yes. After go-live, we saw better process turnaround times, fewer support escalations, and stronger reporting accuracy. The platform is now a practical part of our daily operations rather than a side tool.
What did you like most about working with this company?
Two things stood out: they were candid about tradeoffs, and they stayed accountable through launch. We also liked that their engineers translated technical decisions into business implications our leadership team could evaluate.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes, especially for teams needing a dependable Quality Assurance & Testing partner in Travel & Hospitality. They are not the cheapest vendor, but they are organized, transparent, and focused on outcomes that hold up in production.

Professional partner that understood business context

Samir Gupta / Operations Head - Bricklane Properties
Verified
May 15, 2026

Project summary: This initiative had cross-functional stakeholders and evolving requirements. We looked for a team that could translate business constraints into workable technical decisions.

The project started with some ambiguity on our side, and they helped structure it without overcomplicating scope. Their discovery artifacts were clear, and engineering execution was disciplined. Performance improved noticeably after launch, especially for high-traffic workflows. A few UI details required polish post-release, but response time from their support team was good.

PROS

Clear sprint communication, dependable delivery, and practical technical recommendations

CONS

Their pricing was not the lowest option, but delivery quality largely justified the cost

5.0
Overall
5.0
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Communication
Project Type Embedded Systems Development
Industry Sports & Fitness
Project Cost $10,000 to $49,999
Duration Jan 2025 – Jun 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
We are a mid-sized business in the Sports & Fitness space, and I lead this function as Operations Head. I was responsible for evaluating vendors, aligning stakeholders, and ensuring the project delivered measurable operational gains.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
Our main challenge was that existing Sports & Fitness workflows were fragmented and hard to scale. We needed Embedded Systems Development support to reduce manual effort, improve reliability, and give teams clearer visibility into day-to-day operations.
What services did the company provide for your project?
They handled discovery, technical planning, implementation, QA, deployment, and post-launch stabilization for Embedded Systems Development. Scope was phased sensibly, and they were clear about what should ship now versus move to a later release.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We shortlisted a few firms, but this team stood out for their Embedded Systems Development experience and the way they discussed Sports & Fitness constraints in practical terms. They were transparent about risks and did not overpromise on timelines.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
They understood our requirements well after a structured discovery phase. There were a couple of assumptions we corrected early, but once aligned, execution stayed consistent and traceable against agreed priorities.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Project management was strong: weekly checkpoints, a shared board, and clear ownership on action items. Response times were generally quick, and when blockers appeared, they surfaced them early with concrete mitigation steps.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Most milestones were delivered on time and within the approved budget. We had minor date movement on one integration-heavy stream, but it was communicated in advance and handled without major downstream impact.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
Yes. After go-live, we saw better process turnaround times, fewer support escalations, and stronger reporting accuracy. The platform is now a practical part of our daily operations rather than a side tool.
What did you like most about working with this company?
Two things stood out: they were candid about tradeoffs, and they stayed accountable through launch. We also liked that their engineers translated technical decisions into business implications our leadership team could evaluate.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes, especially for teams needing a dependable Embedded Systems Development partner in Sports & Fitness. They are not the cheapest vendor, but they are organized, transparent, and focused on outcomes that hold up in production.

Overall a productive engagement with room for minor polish

Ben Turner / Director, Network Products - Orbital Telecom
Verified
May 15, 2026

Project summary: Our project involved replacing legacy workflows with a modern platform while keeping business continuity intact. We prioritized maintainability, adoption, and measurable impact.

Good execution with realistic expectations. They did not overpromise, and that made planning much easier on our side. We had one integration issue with a third-party API rate limit that impacted timelines briefly, but they implemented retry handling and monitoring quickly. End result: reliable delivery and a solid foundation for phase two.

PROS

Strong ownership from engineering leads, quick turnaround on review feedback, stable releases

CONS

A few UI polish items spilled into post-launch, though core functionality was stable

5.0
Overall
5.0
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Communication
Project Type Quality Assurance & Testing
Industry Information Technology
Project Cost $500,000+
Duration Dec 2024 – Jul 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
We are a mid-sized business in the Information Technology space, and I lead this function as Director, Network Products. I was responsible for evaluating vendors, aligning stakeholders, and ensuring the project delivered measurable operational gains.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
Our main challenge was that existing Information Technology workflows were fragmented and hard to scale. We needed Quality Assurance & Testing support to reduce manual effort, improve reliability, and give teams clearer visibility into day-to-day operations.
What services did the company provide for your project?
They handled discovery, technical planning, implementation, QA, deployment, and post-launch stabilization for Quality Assurance & Testing. Scope was phased sensibly, and they were clear about what should ship now versus move to a later release.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We shortlisted a few firms, but this team stood out for their Quality Assurance & Testing experience and the way they discussed Information Technology constraints in practical terms. They were transparent about risks and did not overpromise on timelines.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
They understood our requirements well after a structured discovery phase. There were a couple of assumptions we corrected early, but once aligned, execution stayed consistent and traceable against agreed priorities.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Project management was strong: weekly checkpoints, a shared board, and clear ownership on action items. Response times were generally quick, and when blockers appeared, they surfaced them early with concrete mitigation steps.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Most milestones were delivered on time and within the approved budget. We had minor date movement on one integration-heavy stream, but it was communicated in advance and handled without major downstream impact.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
Yes. After go-live, we saw better process turnaround times, fewer support escalations, and stronger reporting accuracy. The platform is now a practical part of our daily operations rather than a side tool.
What did you like most about working with this company?
Two things stood out: they were candid about tradeoffs, and they stayed accountable through launch. We also liked that their engineers translated technical decisions into business implications our leadership team could evaluate.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes, especially for teams needing a dependable Quality Assurance & Testing partner in Information Technology. They are not the cheapest vendor, but they are organized, transparent, and focused on outcomes that hold up in production.

Share this Review

Report Review

You need to be signed in to report a review.

Sign In

Portfolio

No portfolio items yet.

Company Photos

No photos yet.

Frequently Asked Questions

No FAQs yet.

Office Locations

No locations listed.