They are technologists with broad experience with various platforms. Adapting to new or obscure tech is easy for them, and they are not at all religious about any technology. Having experience with many technologies allows us to be extremely objective when choosing a platform for a new project. They develop, combine and migrate your eCommerce project or develop a customized CMS from scratch.
Last updated May 13, 2026
Project summary: We needed to improve customer self-service while reducing ticket load on our support center. The project covered account management, plan changes, and service notifications.
Their work improved both product quality and team confidence. The codebase is understandable, deployment is less stressful, and we have clearer ownership across modules now. There were a couple of moments where timezone overlap slowed feedback loops, yet they adapted with better async documentation and recordings. Overall, we would work with them again.
Clear sprint communication, dependable delivery, and practical technical recommendations
Initial discovery could have been shorter; first two weeks felt documentation-heavy
Project summary: Our care platform had usability issues for both staff and patients. We commissioned a rebuild focused on faster workflows, clearer records, and fewer support escalations.
This team handled a complicated integration landscape better than our previous vendors. They were practical about what should be built now versus deferred, which kept timelines realistic. Testing coverage was decent and they were transparent when defects appeared. We still maintain a short backlog of non-critical enhancements, but the platform is already delivering value.
Strong integration work with third-party systems and proactive monitoring setup
Initial discovery could have been shorter; first two weeks felt documentation-heavy
Project summary: Our project involved replacing legacy workflows with a modern platform while keeping business continuity intact. We prioritized maintainability, adoption, and measurable impact.
The project started with some ambiguity on our side, and they helped structure it without overcomplicating scope. Their discovery artifacts were clear, and engineering execution was disciplined. Performance improved noticeably after launch, especially for high-traffic workflows. A few UI details required polish post-release, but response time from their support team was good.
Well-structured codebase with sensible conventions, making internal maintenance easier
Timezone overlap was limited on some days, so urgent clarifications occasionally slipped by 24 hours
Project summary: We engaged them to solve a set of operational bottlenecks that were limiting scale. The brief combined technical delivery with practical process improvements for day-to-day teams.
Good execution with realistic expectations. They did not overpromise, and that made planning much easier on our side. We had one integration issue with a third-party API rate limit that impacted timelines briefly, but they implemented retry handling and monitoring quickly. End result: reliable delivery and a solid foundation for phase two.
Reliable QA process, predictable milestones, and transparent status reporting
Would prefer more proactive release notes for minor hotfixes