Welcome!

Sign in or create a new account

Sign In Create Account

Need Help?

Reach us or list your business

Request a Quote Get Listed
Home Top Developers All Companies Blog Write For Us Write a Review Sign In Create Account

Ascendix Technologies

Unclaimed Mobile App Development
+19728898090 [email protected]
Visit Website Write Review Claim Profile

About

Since our founding in 1996, Ascendix Technologies has worked exclusively as an implementer, integrator and a developer of top-tier CRM systems and mobile apps. We have worked with no less than ten CRM platforms and have extensive CRM expertise and portfolio. We are Salesforce and Dynamics 365 Partners. Also, we develop mobile and web apps for our clients using our knowledge in Salesforce, Dynamics, Xamarin, iOS, Android, Outsystems, Java and other technologies. Ascendix has 17 own products and apps that help companies get the most out of their data. A CRM and app development consultant of choice for commercial real estate companies.

Last updated May 13, 2026

Services

Mobile App Development Custom Software Development Android App Development iOS App Development CRM Development Xamarin App Development

Client Rating

5.0/5.0
4 reviews
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Communication
5.0
View All Reviews →

Client Reviews

5.0/5.0 (4 reviews)
Sign in to Review
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Communication
5.0

Reliable mobile team that handled product changes calmly

Ben Turner / Director, Network Products - Orbital Telecom
Verified
May 15, 2026

Project summary: We needed to improve booking confidence with clearer pricing and fewer failed payment flows. Integration stability with suppliers was a key success factor.

Good execution with realistic expectations. They did not overpromise, and that made planning much easier on our side. We had one integration issue with a third-party API rate limit that impacted timelines briefly, but they implemented retry handling and monitoring quickly. End result: reliable delivery and a solid foundation for phase two.

PROS

Strong ownership from engineering leads, quick turnaround on review feedback, stable releases

CONS

Would prefer more proactive release notes for minor hotfixes

5.0
Overall
5.0
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Communication
Project Type Mobile App Development
Industry Travel & Hospitality
Project Cost $500,000+
Duration Mar 2025 – Mar 2026

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
We are a mid-sized business in the Travel & Hospitality space, and I lead this function as Director, Network Products. I was responsible for evaluating vendors, aligning stakeholders, and ensuring the project delivered measurable operational gains.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
Our main challenge was that existing Travel & Hospitality workflows were fragmented and hard to scale. We needed Mobile App Development support to reduce manual effort, improve reliability, and give teams clearer visibility into day-to-day operations.
What services did the company provide for your project?
They handled discovery, technical planning, implementation, QA, deployment, and post-launch stabilization for Mobile App Development. Scope was phased sensibly, and they were clear about what should ship now versus move to a later release.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We shortlisted a few firms, but this team stood out for their Mobile App Development experience and the way they discussed Travel & Hospitality constraints in practical terms. They were transparent about risks and did not overpromise on timelines.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
They understood our requirements well after a structured discovery phase. There were a couple of assumptions we corrected early, but once aligned, execution stayed consistent and traceable against agreed priorities.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Project management was strong: weekly checkpoints, a shared board, and clear ownership on action items. Response times were generally quick, and when blockers appeared, they surfaced them early with concrete mitigation steps.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Most milestones were delivered on time and within the approved budget. We had minor date movement on one integration-heavy stream, but it was communicated in advance and handled without major downstream impact.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
Yes. After go-live, we saw better process turnaround times, fewer support escalations, and stronger reporting accuracy. The platform is now a practical part of our daily operations rather than a side tool.
What did you like most about working with this company?
Two things stood out: they were candid about tradeoffs, and they stayed accountable through launch. We also liked that their engineers translated technical decisions into business implications our leadership team could evaluate.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes, especially for teams needing a dependable Mobile App Development partner in Travel & Hospitality. They are not the cheapest vendor, but they are organized, transparent, and focused on outcomes that hold up in production.

A capable team that balanced speed and quality well

Farah Khan / Managing Director - Lumen Legal Tech
Verified
May 15, 2026

Project summary: We needed a partner who could handle ambiguity early, then execute predictably once requirements were clarified. Delivery discipline and communication quality were both important.

The engagement was well-run overall. Their team mapped our requirements into a realistic release plan and called out dependencies early, which helped us avoid late surprises. Quality was strong in the core modules, and they handled feedback quickly during UAT. We did need an extra sprint for edge-case behavior around reporting filters, but they owned it and closed it cleanly.

PROS

Good domain understanding, thoughtful architecture choices, and clean handoff documentation

CONS

Would prefer more proactive release notes for minor hotfixes

5.0
Overall
5.0
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Communication
Project Type Quality Assurance & Testing
Industry Events & Event Management
Project Cost $10,000 to $49,999
Duration Apr 2025 – May 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
We are a mid-sized business in the Events & Event Management space, and I lead this function as Managing Director. I was responsible for evaluating vendors, aligning stakeholders, and ensuring the project delivered measurable operational gains.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
Our main challenge was that existing Events & Event Management workflows were fragmented and hard to scale. We needed Quality Assurance & Testing support to reduce manual effort, improve reliability, and give teams clearer visibility into day-to-day operations.
What services did the company provide for your project?
They handled discovery, technical planning, implementation, QA, deployment, and post-launch stabilization for Quality Assurance & Testing. Scope was phased sensibly, and they were clear about what should ship now versus move to a later release.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We shortlisted a few firms, but this team stood out for their Quality Assurance & Testing experience and the way they discussed Events & Event Management constraints in practical terms. They were transparent about risks and did not overpromise on timelines.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
They understood our requirements well after a structured discovery phase. There were a couple of assumptions we corrected early, but once aligned, execution stayed consistent and traceable against agreed priorities.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Project management was strong: weekly checkpoints, a shared board, and clear ownership on action items. Response times were generally quick, and when blockers appeared, they surfaced them early with concrete mitigation steps.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Most milestones were delivered on time and within the approved budget. We had minor date movement on one integration-heavy stream, but it was communicated in advance and handled without major downstream impact.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
Yes. After go-live, we saw better process turnaround times, fewer support escalations, and stronger reporting accuracy. The platform is now a practical part of our daily operations rather than a side tool.
What did you like most about working with this company?
Two things stood out: they were candid about tradeoffs, and they stayed accountable through launch. We also liked that their engineers translated technical decisions into business implications our leadership team could evaluate.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes, especially for teams needing a dependable Quality Assurance & Testing partner in Events & Event Management. They are not the cheapest vendor, but they are organized, transparent, and focused on outcomes that hold up in production.

Overall a productive engagement with room for minor polish

Olivia Bennett / Director of Digital Learning - BrightPath Learning
Verified
May 15, 2026

Project summary: We needed a partner who could handle ambiguity early, then execute predictably once requirements were clarified. Delivery discipline and communication quality were both important.

We saw meaningful outcomes within the first month after go-live: fewer support tickets, faster turnaround for internal teams, and better reporting confidence. The implementation was not flashy, but it was thoughtful and production-ready. We would have liked more onboarding materials for non-technical users, though their team provided follow-up sessions when requested.

PROS

Ability to translate business goals into usable product decisions, not just technical output

CONS

Initial discovery could have been shorter; first two weeks felt documentation-heavy

5.0
Overall
5.0
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Communication
Project Type Quality Assurance & Testing
Industry Energy & Utilities
Project Cost Less than $10,000
Duration Mar 2025 – Jan 2026

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
We are a mid-sized business in the Energy & Utilities space, and I lead this function as Director of Digital Learning. I was responsible for evaluating vendors, aligning stakeholders, and ensuring the project delivered measurable operational gains.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
Our main challenge was that existing Energy & Utilities workflows were fragmented and hard to scale. We needed Quality Assurance & Testing support to reduce manual effort, improve reliability, and give teams clearer visibility into day-to-day operations.
What services did the company provide for your project?
They handled discovery, technical planning, implementation, QA, deployment, and post-launch stabilization for Quality Assurance & Testing. Scope was phased sensibly, and they were clear about what should ship now versus move to a later release.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We shortlisted a few firms, but this team stood out for their Quality Assurance & Testing experience and the way they discussed Energy & Utilities constraints in practical terms. They were transparent about risks and did not overpromise on timelines.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
They understood our requirements well after a structured discovery phase. There were a couple of assumptions we corrected early, but once aligned, execution stayed consistent and traceable against agreed priorities.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Project management was strong: weekly checkpoints, a shared board, and clear ownership on action items. Response times were generally quick, and when blockers appeared, they surfaced them early with concrete mitigation steps.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Most milestones were delivered on time and within the approved budget. We had minor date movement on one integration-heavy stream, but it was communicated in advance and handled without major downstream impact.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
Yes. After go-live, we saw better process turnaround times, fewer support escalations, and stronger reporting accuracy. The platform is now a practical part of our daily operations rather than a side tool.
What did you like most about working with this company?
Two things stood out: they were candid about tradeoffs, and they stayed accountable through launch. We also liked that their engineers translated technical decisions into business implications our leadership team could evaluate.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes, especially for teams needing a dependable Quality Assurance & Testing partner in Energy & Utilities. They are not the cheapest vendor, but they are organized, transparent, and focused on outcomes that hold up in production.

Overall a productive engagement with room for minor polish

Marcus Reid / Head of Operations - HarborOps Technology
Verified
May 15, 2026

Project summary: Unplanned downtime and disconnected reporting were hurting throughput. We aimed for a phased digital rollout that could prove value early without disrupting operations.

This team handled a complicated integration landscape better than our previous vendors. They were practical about what should be built now versus deferred, which kept timelines realistic. Testing coverage was decent and they were transparent when defects appeared. We still maintain a short backlog of non-critical enhancements, but the platform is already delivering value.

PROS

Ability to translate business goals into usable product decisions, not just technical output

CONS

Knowledge transfer for non-technical users needed one extra session beyond the original plan

5.0
Overall
5.0
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Communication
Project Type Game Development
Industry Manufacturing
Project Cost $10,000 to $49,999
Duration May 2025 – Sep 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
We are a mid-sized business in the Manufacturing space, and I lead this function as Head of Operations. I was responsible for evaluating vendors, aligning stakeholders, and ensuring the project delivered measurable operational gains.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
Our main challenge was that existing Manufacturing workflows were fragmented and hard to scale. We needed Game Development support to reduce manual effort, improve reliability, and give teams clearer visibility into day-to-day operations.
What services did the company provide for your project?
They handled discovery, technical planning, implementation, QA, deployment, and post-launch stabilization for Game Development. Scope was phased sensibly, and they were clear about what should ship now versus move to a later release.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We shortlisted a few firms, but this team stood out for their Game Development experience and the way they discussed Manufacturing constraints in practical terms. They were transparent about risks and did not overpromise on timelines.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
They understood our requirements well after a structured discovery phase. There were a couple of assumptions we corrected early, but once aligned, execution stayed consistent and traceable against agreed priorities.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Project management was strong: weekly checkpoints, a shared board, and clear ownership on action items. Response times were generally quick, and when blockers appeared, they surfaced them early with concrete mitigation steps.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Most milestones were delivered on time and within the approved budget. We had minor date movement on one integration-heavy stream, but it was communicated in advance and handled without major downstream impact.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
Yes. After go-live, we saw better process turnaround times, fewer support escalations, and stronger reporting accuracy. The platform is now a practical part of our daily operations rather than a side tool.
What did you like most about working with this company?
Two things stood out: they were candid about tradeoffs, and they stayed accountable through launch. We also liked that their engineers translated technical decisions into business implications our leadership team could evaluate.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes, especially for teams needing a dependable Game Development partner in Manufacturing. They are not the cheapest vendor, but they are organized, transparent, and focused on outcomes that hold up in production.

Share this Review

Report Review

You need to be signed in to report a review.

Sign In

Portfolio

No portfolio items yet.

Company Photos

No photos yet.

Frequently Asked Questions

No FAQs yet.

Office Locations

No locations listed.