Welcome!

Sign in or create a new account

Sign In Create Account

Need Help?

Reach us or list your business

Request a Quote Get Listed
Home Top Developers All Companies Blog Write For Us Write a Review Sign In Create Account

Arkitec Software

Unclaimed Mobile App Development
+441915945055 [email protected]
Visit Website Write Review Claim Profile

About

Arkitec specializes in resolving problems using technology, expertise, and proven best practices and have produced award-winning software & web development services. They have a huge range of technical skills & industry experience. Their purpose is to give the best service that sets their clients advanced of the game not just technically but in terms of name and place also.

Last updated May 13, 2026

Services

Mobile App Development Web Development Custom Software Development Web Design E-commerce Development

Client Rating

5.0/5.0
4 reviews
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Communication
5.0
View All Reviews →

Client Reviews

5.0/5.0 (4 reviews)
Sign in to Review
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Communication
5.0

Good execution, realistic timelines, and strong follow-through

Zain Malik / CTO - AgroLink Systems
Verified
May 15, 2026

Project summary: Our project involved replacing legacy workflows with a modern platform while keeping business continuity intact. We prioritized maintainability, adoption, and measurable impact.

Good execution with realistic expectations. They did not overpromise, and that made planning much easier on our side. We had one integration issue with a third-party API rate limit that impacted timelines briefly, but they implemented retry handling and monitoring quickly. End result: reliable delivery and a solid foundation for phase two.

PROS

Good domain understanding, thoughtful architecture choices, and clean handoff documentation

CONS

One third-party integration took longer than expected due to external API constraints

5.0
Overall
5.0
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Communication
Project Type Embedded Systems Development
Industry Aerospace & Defense
Project Cost $150,000 to $499,999
Duration Sep 2024 – Jan 2026

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
We are a mid-sized business in the Aerospace & Defense space, and I lead this function as CTO. I was responsible for evaluating vendors, aligning stakeholders, and ensuring the project delivered measurable operational gains.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
Our main challenge was that existing Aerospace & Defense workflows were fragmented and hard to scale. We needed Embedded Systems Development support to reduce manual effort, improve reliability, and give teams clearer visibility into day-to-day operations.
What services did the company provide for your project?
They handled discovery, technical planning, implementation, QA, deployment, and post-launch stabilization for Embedded Systems Development. Scope was phased sensibly, and they were clear about what should ship now versus move to a later release.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We shortlisted a few firms, but this team stood out for their Embedded Systems Development experience and the way they discussed Aerospace & Defense constraints in practical terms. They were transparent about risks and did not overpromise on timelines.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
They understood our requirements well after a structured discovery phase. There were a couple of assumptions we corrected early, but once aligned, execution stayed consistent and traceable against agreed priorities.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Project management was strong: weekly checkpoints, a shared board, and clear ownership on action items. Response times were generally quick, and when blockers appeared, they surfaced them early with concrete mitigation steps.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Most milestones were delivered on time and within the approved budget. We had minor date movement on one integration-heavy stream, but it was communicated in advance and handled without major downstream impact.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
Yes. After go-live, we saw better process turnaround times, fewer support escalations, and stronger reporting accuracy. The platform is now a practical part of our daily operations rather than a side tool.
What did you like most about working with this company?
Two things stood out: they were candid about tradeoffs, and they stayed accountable through launch. We also liked that their engineers translated technical decisions into business implications our leadership team could evaluate.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes, especially for teams needing a dependable Embedded Systems Development partner in Aerospace & Defense. They are not the cheapest vendor, but they are organized, transparent, and focused on outcomes that hold up in production.

A capable team that balanced speed and quality well

Ethan Brooks / CTO - LedgerNest Fintech
Verified
May 15, 2026

Project summary: Our project involved replacing legacy workflows with a modern platform while keeping business continuity intact. We prioritized maintainability, adoption, and measurable impact.

The engagement was well-run overall. Their team mapped our requirements into a realistic release plan and called out dependencies early, which helped us avoid late surprises. Quality was strong in the core modules, and they handled feedback quickly during UAT. We did need an extra sprint for edge-case behavior around reporting filters, but they owned it and closed it cleanly.

PROS

Responsive support after launch and willingness to refine workflows based on real user behavior

CONS

Some change requests required formal reprioritization, which was correct but slowed quick tweaks

5.0
Overall
5.0
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Communication
Project Type Quality Assurance & Testing
Industry Environmental Services
Project Cost Less than $10,000
Duration Feb 2025 – Mar 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
We are a mid-sized business in the Environmental Services space, and I lead this function as CTO. I was responsible for evaluating vendors, aligning stakeholders, and ensuring the project delivered measurable operational gains.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
Our main challenge was that existing Environmental Services workflows were fragmented and hard to scale. We needed Quality Assurance & Testing support to reduce manual effort, improve reliability, and give teams clearer visibility into day-to-day operations.
What services did the company provide for your project?
They handled discovery, technical planning, implementation, QA, deployment, and post-launch stabilization for Quality Assurance & Testing. Scope was phased sensibly, and they were clear about what should ship now versus move to a later release.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We shortlisted a few firms, but this team stood out for their Quality Assurance & Testing experience and the way they discussed Environmental Services constraints in practical terms. They were transparent about risks and did not overpromise on timelines.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
They understood our requirements well after a structured discovery phase. There were a couple of assumptions we corrected early, but once aligned, execution stayed consistent and traceable against agreed priorities.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Project management was strong: weekly checkpoints, a shared board, and clear ownership on action items. Response times were generally quick, and when blockers appeared, they surfaced them early with concrete mitigation steps.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Most milestones were delivered on time and within the approved budget. We had minor date movement on one integration-heavy stream, but it was communicated in advance and handled without major downstream impact.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
Yes. After go-live, we saw better process turnaround times, fewer support escalations, and stronger reporting accuracy. The platform is now a practical part of our daily operations rather than a side tool.
What did you like most about working with this company?
Two things stood out: they were candid about tradeoffs, and they stayed accountable through launch. We also liked that their engineers translated technical decisions into business implications our leadership team could evaluate.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes, especially for teams needing a dependable Quality Assurance & Testing partner in Environmental Services. They are not the cheapest vendor, but they are organized, transparent, and focused on outcomes that hold up in production.

Good execution, realistic timelines, and strong follow-through

Marcus Reid / Head of Operations - HarborOps Technology
Verified
May 15, 2026

Project summary: Our project involved replacing legacy workflows with a modern platform while keeping business continuity intact. We prioritized maintainability, adoption, and measurable impact.

Their work improved both product quality and team confidence. The codebase is understandable, deployment is less stressful, and we have clearer ownership across modules now. There were a couple of moments where timezone overlap slowed feedback loops, yet they adapted with better async documentation and recordings. Overall, we would work with them again.

PROS

Strong ownership from engineering leads, quick turnaround on review feedback, stable releases

CONS

Initial discovery could have been shorter; first two weeks felt documentation-heavy

5.0
Overall
5.0
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Communication
Project Type Low-Code / No-Code Development
Industry Environmental Services
Project Cost Less than $10,000
Duration Sep 2025 – Apr 2026

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
We are a mid-sized business in the Environmental Services space, and I lead this function as Head of Operations. I was responsible for evaluating vendors, aligning stakeholders, and ensuring the project delivered measurable operational gains.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
Our main challenge was that existing Environmental Services workflows were fragmented and hard to scale. We needed Low-Code / No-Code Development support to reduce manual effort, improve reliability, and give teams clearer visibility into day-to-day operations.
What services did the company provide for your project?
They handled discovery, technical planning, implementation, QA, deployment, and post-launch stabilization for Low-Code / No-Code Development. Scope was phased sensibly, and they were clear about what should ship now versus move to a later release.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We shortlisted a few firms, but this team stood out for their Low-Code / No-Code Development experience and the way they discussed Environmental Services constraints in practical terms. They were transparent about risks and did not overpromise on timelines.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
They understood our requirements well after a structured discovery phase. There were a couple of assumptions we corrected early, but once aligned, execution stayed consistent and traceable against agreed priorities.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Project management was strong: weekly checkpoints, a shared board, and clear ownership on action items. Response times were generally quick, and when blockers appeared, they surfaced them early with concrete mitigation steps.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Most milestones were delivered on time and within the approved budget. We had minor date movement on one integration-heavy stream, but it was communicated in advance and handled without major downstream impact.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
Yes. After go-live, we saw better process turnaround times, fewer support escalations, and stronger reporting accuracy. The platform is now a practical part of our daily operations rather than a side tool.
What did you like most about working with this company?
Two things stood out: they were candid about tradeoffs, and they stayed accountable through launch. We also liked that their engineers translated technical decisions into business implications our leadership team could evaluate.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes, especially for teams needing a dependable Low-Code / No-Code Development partner in Environmental Services. They are not the cheapest vendor, but they are organized, transparent, and focused on outcomes that hold up in production.

Practical AI implementation with measurable workflow impact

Olivia Bennett / Director of Digital Learning - BrightPath Learning
Verified
May 15, 2026

Project summary: We needed a learning experience that worked for both live classes and self-paced cohorts. Reporting for instructors and completion tracking for management were both essential.

The collaboration felt grounded in outcomes rather than vanity features. They pushed back when something added complexity without user value, which we appreciated. Internal adoption has been better than expected, partly because workflows now match how teams actually work. A few visual elements can still be refined, but functionally the system is in a strong place.

PROS

Clear sprint communication, dependable delivery, and practical technical recommendations

CONS

Would prefer more proactive release notes for minor hotfixes

5.0
Overall
5.0
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Communication
Project Type Blockchain Development
Industry Education
Project Cost $500,000+
Duration Feb 2025 – May 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
We are a mid-sized business in the Education space, and I lead this function as Director of Digital Learning. I was responsible for evaluating vendors, aligning stakeholders, and ensuring the project delivered measurable operational gains.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
Our main challenge was that existing Education workflows were fragmented and hard to scale. We needed Blockchain Development support to reduce manual effort, improve reliability, and give teams clearer visibility into day-to-day operations.
What services did the company provide for your project?
They handled discovery, technical planning, implementation, QA, deployment, and post-launch stabilization for Blockchain Development. Scope was phased sensibly, and they were clear about what should ship now versus move to a later release.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We shortlisted a few firms, but this team stood out for their Blockchain Development experience and the way they discussed Education constraints in practical terms. They were transparent about risks and did not overpromise on timelines.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
They understood our requirements well after a structured discovery phase. There were a couple of assumptions we corrected early, but once aligned, execution stayed consistent and traceable against agreed priorities.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Project management was strong: weekly checkpoints, a shared board, and clear ownership on action items. Response times were generally quick, and when blockers appeared, they surfaced them early with concrete mitigation steps.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Most milestones were delivered on time and within the approved budget. We had minor date movement on one integration-heavy stream, but it was communicated in advance and handled without major downstream impact.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
Yes. After go-live, we saw better process turnaround times, fewer support escalations, and stronger reporting accuracy. The platform is now a practical part of our daily operations rather than a side tool.
What did you like most about working with this company?
Two things stood out: they were candid about tradeoffs, and they stayed accountable through launch. We also liked that their engineers translated technical decisions into business implications our leadership team could evaluate.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes, especially for teams needing a dependable Blockchain Development partner in Education. They are not the cheapest vendor, but they are organized, transparent, and focused on outcomes that hold up in production.

Share this Review

Report Review

You need to be signed in to report a review.

Sign In

Portfolio

No portfolio items yet.

Company Photos

No photos yet.

Frequently Asked Questions

No FAQs yet.

Office Locations

No locations listed.