As a client, you can have confidence knowing that this isn’t their first rodeo. When you engage Advice Media, you’re gaining a full team to support your business. Most of their clients work within the medical field, which alone is not unique. What separates Advice Media from the pack is our keen understanding of the fee for service patient, a specific distinction that should matter to your practice.
Last updated May 13, 2026
Project summary: This initiative had cross-functional stakeholders and evolving requirements. We looked for a team that could translate business constraints into workable technical decisions.
The project started with some ambiguity on our side, and they helped structure it without overcomplicating scope. Their discovery artifacts were clear, and engineering execution was disciplined. Performance improved noticeably after launch, especially for high-traffic workflows. A few UI details required polish post-release, but response time from their support team was good.
Clear sprint communication, dependable delivery, and practical technical recommendations
Knowledge transfer for non-technical users needed one extra session beyond the original plan
Project summary: We needed to improve booking confidence with clearer pricing and fewer failed payment flows. Integration stability with suppliers was a key success factor.
Communication quality was one of the stronger parts of this engagement. We always had visibility into progress, blockers, and next steps. Their engineers challenged assumptions respectfully and prevented a couple of costly feature detours. There were minor delays during final data migration, but they staffed up and recovered most of the schedule quickly.
Strong ownership from engineering leads, quick turnaround on review feedback, stable releases
Timezone overlap was limited on some days, so urgent clarifications occasionally slipped by 24 hours
Project summary: Our project involved replacing legacy workflows with a modern platform while keeping business continuity intact. We prioritized maintainability, adoption, and measurable impact.
Their work improved both product quality and team confidence. The codebase is understandable, deployment is less stressful, and we have clearer ownership across modules now. There were a couple of moments where timezone overlap slowed feedback loops, yet they adapted with better async documentation and recordings. Overall, we would work with them again.
Clear sprint communication, dependable delivery, and practical technical recommendations
Would prefer more proactive release notes for minor hotfixes