Welcome!

Sign in or create a new account

Sign In Create Account

Need Help?

Reach us or list your business

Request a Quote Get Listed
Home Top Developers All Companies Blog Write For Us Write a Review Sign In Create Account

ADCI Solutions

Unclaimed Mobile App Development
+14074139319 [email protected]
Visit Website Write Review Claim Profile

About

ADCI Solutions is a featured Drupal service provider. They have been a Drupal Supporting partner since 2012 and have become the first Premium Supporting partner in Russia in 2013. They provide the full cycle web development services from the initial analysis to the final product aligned with your business vision. It is one of the best web development company.

Last updated May 13, 2026

Services

Mobile App Development Web Development VR App Development Custom Software Development Enterprise App Modernization Chat Bots & AI Development Mobile App Design Ethereum Blockchain

Client Rating

5.0/5.0
4 reviews
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Communication
5.0
View All Reviews →

Client Reviews

5.0/5.0 (4 reviews)
Sign in to Review
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Communication
5.0

Dependable delivery with clear communication throughout

Isabella Rossi / Head of Digital Commerce - Arco Fashion House
Verified
May 15, 2026

Project summary: We needed a partner who could handle ambiguity early, then execute predictably once requirements were clarified. Delivery discipline and communication quality were both important.

Good execution with realistic expectations. They did not overpromise, and that made planning much easier on our side. We had one integration issue with a third-party API rate limit that impacted timelines briefly, but they implemented retry handling and monitoring quickly. End result: reliable delivery and a solid foundation for phase two.

PROS

Good domain understanding, thoughtful architecture choices, and clean handoff documentation

CONS

A few UI polish items spilled into post-launch, though core functionality was stable

5.0
Overall
5.0
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Communication
Project Type Low-Code / No-Code Development
Industry Nonprofit & NGO
Project Cost $150,000 to $499,999
Duration Jul 2025 – Sep 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
We are a mid-sized business in the Nonprofit & NGO space, and I lead this function as Head of Digital Commerce. I was responsible for evaluating vendors, aligning stakeholders, and ensuring the project delivered measurable operational gains.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
Our main challenge was that existing Nonprofit & NGO workflows were fragmented and hard to scale. We needed Low-Code / No-Code Development support to reduce manual effort, improve reliability, and give teams clearer visibility into day-to-day operations.
What services did the company provide for your project?
They handled discovery, technical planning, implementation, QA, deployment, and post-launch stabilization for Low-Code / No-Code Development. Scope was phased sensibly, and they were clear about what should ship now versus move to a later release.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We shortlisted a few firms, but this team stood out for their Low-Code / No-Code Development experience and the way they discussed Nonprofit & NGO constraints in practical terms. They were transparent about risks and did not overpromise on timelines.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
They understood our requirements well after a structured discovery phase. There were a couple of assumptions we corrected early, but once aligned, execution stayed consistent and traceable against agreed priorities.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Project management was strong: weekly checkpoints, a shared board, and clear ownership on action items. Response times were generally quick, and when blockers appeared, they surfaced them early with concrete mitigation steps.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Most milestones were delivered on time and within the approved budget. We had minor date movement on one integration-heavy stream, but it was communicated in advance and handled without major downstream impact.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
Yes. After go-live, we saw better process turnaround times, fewer support escalations, and stronger reporting accuracy. The platform is now a practical part of our daily operations rather than a side tool.
What did you like most about working with this company?
Two things stood out: they were candid about tradeoffs, and they stayed accountable through launch. We also liked that their engineers translated technical decisions into business implications our leadership team could evaluate.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes, especially for teams needing a dependable Low-Code / No-Code Development partner in Nonprofit & NGO. They are not the cheapest vendor, but they are organized, transparent, and focused on outcomes that hold up in production.

Overall a productive engagement with room for minor polish

Ben Turner / Director, Network Products - Orbital Telecom
Verified
May 15, 2026

Project summary: We needed a partner who could handle ambiguity early, then execute predictably once requirements were clarified. Delivery discipline and communication quality were both important.

Their work improved both product quality and team confidence. The codebase is understandable, deployment is less stressful, and we have clearer ownership across modules now. There were a couple of moments where timezone overlap slowed feedback loops, yet they adapted with better async documentation and recordings. Overall, we would work with them again.

PROS

Clear sprint communication, dependable delivery, and practical technical recommendations

CONS

Initial discovery could have been shorter; first two weeks felt documentation-heavy

5.0
Overall
5.0
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Communication
Project Type Industry-Specific Solutions
Industry Nonprofit & NGO
Project Cost $500,000+
Duration Aug 2025 – Feb 2026

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
We are a mid-sized business in the Nonprofit & NGO space, and I lead this function as Director, Network Products. I was responsible for evaluating vendors, aligning stakeholders, and ensuring the project delivered measurable operational gains.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
Our main challenge was that existing Nonprofit & NGO workflows were fragmented and hard to scale. We needed Industry-Specific Solutions support to reduce manual effort, improve reliability, and give teams clearer visibility into day-to-day operations.
What services did the company provide for your project?
They handled discovery, technical planning, implementation, QA, deployment, and post-launch stabilization for Industry-Specific Solutions. Scope was phased sensibly, and they were clear about what should ship now versus move to a later release.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We shortlisted a few firms, but this team stood out for their Industry-Specific Solutions experience and the way they discussed Nonprofit & NGO constraints in practical terms. They were transparent about risks and did not overpromise on timelines.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
They understood our requirements well after a structured discovery phase. There were a couple of assumptions we corrected early, but once aligned, execution stayed consistent and traceable against agreed priorities.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Project management was strong: weekly checkpoints, a shared board, and clear ownership on action items. Response times were generally quick, and when blockers appeared, they surfaced them early with concrete mitigation steps.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Most milestones were delivered on time and within the approved budget. We had minor date movement on one integration-heavy stream, but it was communicated in advance and handled without major downstream impact.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
Yes. After go-live, we saw better process turnaround times, fewer support escalations, and stronger reporting accuracy. The platform is now a practical part of our daily operations rather than a side tool.
What did you like most about working with this company?
Two things stood out: they were candid about tradeoffs, and they stayed accountable through launch. We also liked that their engineers translated technical decisions into business implications our leadership team could evaluate.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes, especially for teams needing a dependable Industry-Specific Solutions partner in Nonprofit & NGO. They are not the cheapest vendor, but they are organized, transparent, and focused on outcomes that hold up in production.

Overall a productive engagement with room for minor polish

George Wallace / CIO - MetroInsure
Verified
May 15, 2026

Project summary: We needed a partner who could handle ambiguity early, then execute predictably once requirements were clarified. Delivery discipline and communication quality were both important.

The collaboration felt grounded in outcomes rather than vanity features. They pushed back when something added complexity without user value, which we appreciated. Internal adoption has been better than expected, partly because workflows now match how teams actually work. A few visual elements can still be refined, but functionally the system is in a strong place.

PROS

Strong integration work with third-party systems and proactive monitoring setup

CONS

Their pricing was not the lowest option, but delivery quality largely justified the cost

5.0
Overall
5.0
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Communication
Project Type CMS Development
Industry Aerospace & Defense
Project Cost $50,000 to $149,999
Duration Sep 2025 – Dec 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
We are a mid-sized business in the Aerospace & Defense space, and I lead this function as CIO. I was responsible for evaluating vendors, aligning stakeholders, and ensuring the project delivered measurable operational gains.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
Our main challenge was that existing Aerospace & Defense workflows were fragmented and hard to scale. We needed CMS Development support to reduce manual effort, improve reliability, and give teams clearer visibility into day-to-day operations.
What services did the company provide for your project?
They handled discovery, technical planning, implementation, QA, deployment, and post-launch stabilization for CMS Development. Scope was phased sensibly, and they were clear about what should ship now versus move to a later release.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We shortlisted a few firms, but this team stood out for their CMS Development experience and the way they discussed Aerospace & Defense constraints in practical terms. They were transparent about risks and did not overpromise on timelines.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
They understood our requirements well after a structured discovery phase. There were a couple of assumptions we corrected early, but once aligned, execution stayed consistent and traceable against agreed priorities.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Project management was strong: weekly checkpoints, a shared board, and clear ownership on action items. Response times were generally quick, and when blockers appeared, they surfaced them early with concrete mitigation steps.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Most milestones were delivered on time and within the approved budget. We had minor date movement on one integration-heavy stream, but it was communicated in advance and handled without major downstream impact.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
Yes. After go-live, we saw better process turnaround times, fewer support escalations, and stronger reporting accuracy. The platform is now a practical part of our daily operations rather than a side tool.
What did you like most about working with this company?
Two things stood out: they were candid about tradeoffs, and they stayed accountable through launch. We also liked that their engineers translated technical decisions into business implications our leadership team could evaluate.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes, especially for teams needing a dependable CMS Development partner in Aerospace & Defense. They are not the cheapest vendor, but they are organized, transparent, and focused on outcomes that hold up in production.

Dependable delivery with clear communication throughout

Jade Wilson / Founder & CEO - HiveForge Startup Studio
Verified
May 15, 2026

Project summary: We needed a partner who could handle ambiguity early, then execute predictably once requirements were clarified. Delivery discipline and communication quality were both important.

We saw meaningful outcomes within the first month after go-live: fewer support tickets, faster turnaround for internal teams, and better reporting confidence. The implementation was not flashy, but it was thoughtful and production-ready. We would have liked more onboarding materials for non-technical users, though their team provided follow-up sessions when requested.

PROS

Strong ownership from engineering leads, quick turnaround on review feedback, stable releases

CONS

Some change requests required formal reprioritization, which was correct but slowed quick tweaks

5.0
Overall
5.0
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Communication
Project Type IT Consulting
Industry Sports & Fitness
Project Cost $150,000 to $499,999
Duration Sep 2024 – Oct 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
We are a mid-sized business in the Sports & Fitness space, and I lead this function as Founder & CEO. I was responsible for evaluating vendors, aligning stakeholders, and ensuring the project delivered measurable operational gains.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
Our main challenge was that existing Sports & Fitness workflows were fragmented and hard to scale. We needed IT Consulting support to reduce manual effort, improve reliability, and give teams clearer visibility into day-to-day operations.
What services did the company provide for your project?
They handled discovery, technical planning, implementation, QA, deployment, and post-launch stabilization for IT Consulting. Scope was phased sensibly, and they were clear about what should ship now versus move to a later release.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We shortlisted a few firms, but this team stood out for their IT Consulting experience and the way they discussed Sports & Fitness constraints in practical terms. They were transparent about risks and did not overpromise on timelines.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
They understood our requirements well after a structured discovery phase. There were a couple of assumptions we corrected early, but once aligned, execution stayed consistent and traceable against agreed priorities.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Project management was strong: weekly checkpoints, a shared board, and clear ownership on action items. Response times were generally quick, and when blockers appeared, they surfaced them early with concrete mitigation steps.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Most milestones were delivered on time and within the approved budget. We had minor date movement on one integration-heavy stream, but it was communicated in advance and handled without major downstream impact.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
Yes. After go-live, we saw better process turnaround times, fewer support escalations, and stronger reporting accuracy. The platform is now a practical part of our daily operations rather than a side tool.
What did you like most about working with this company?
Two things stood out: they were candid about tradeoffs, and they stayed accountable through launch. We also liked that their engineers translated technical decisions into business implications our leadership team could evaluate.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes, especially for teams needing a dependable IT Consulting partner in Sports & Fitness. They are not the cheapest vendor, but they are organized, transparent, and focused on outcomes that hold up in production.

Share this Review

Report Review

You need to be signed in to report a review.

Sign In

Portfolio

No portfolio items yet.

Company Photos

No photos yet.

Frequently Asked Questions

No FAQs yet.

Office Locations

No locations listed.